tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097558559984785911.post2451490122616132994..comments2023-10-05T06:10:23.161-04:00Comments on Daily notes of a scientist: Why and how stakeholders change their mind?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5097558559984785911.post-22771917059961901042009-11-20T12:58:42.573-05:002009-11-20T12:58:42.573-05:00Personally, I prefer the approach of methods such ...Personally, I prefer the approach of methods such as ATAM in which they explicitly tell the stakeholder the rationale behind prioritizing the requirements and then they try to analyze and solve any inconsistency and conflict in the existing rankings among stakeholders in brainstorming workshops. (e.g. in case of ATAM, the stakeholder prioritize the quality attributes based on ease of implementation and importance). <br />In my practice, I specify the existing criteria and the exact definition of each criteria. In some cases, we may define criteria and sub-criteria. Also, I utilize brainstorming workshops for reaching to conclusion about the priority of each feature and/or requirement. <br /><br />I think that if we do not specify the logic, we can not reach to a useful result.<br /><br />BTW, I enjoyed reading your blog. Please invite others to contribute and keep writing and share your experience with others.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12862563721916556272noreply@blogger.com